« “Fragments of my Imagination” …. | Main | One Big Series of Constructions and Deconstructions »

Joel's comment to Danielle

I find your insights very interesting, and you bring up a point I have often wondered myself: how racially consistent will the teaching pool remain? Even if the newly graduated pool of teaching candidates is 50 percent Hispanic, will this much needed change be enough? I am not sure if I am saying this correctly or using the appropriate terminology, but my point is that even if the teaching pool of K-12 graduates changes as to racial composition, how will this change in racial and cultural composition affect the core teaching values of these graduates if the university faculty does not change its racial and cultural composition? It is easy and almost imperceptible for a dominator class of educators (even unintentionally) to pass on certain values that support the dominant class.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.rcoe.appstate.edu/admin/mt-tb.cgi/4907

Comments (3)

Danielle:

Thanks for commenting Joel. I think you touched on the "dirty little secret" within Higher Ed...It is so easy for Edu professors/instructors to criticize all that is wrong in K12 but very little innovation takes place at the college level. Don't we teach what we know? If a student is exposed to Emily Dickson time and again, she isn't likely to teach Toni Morrison. If a student is taught using traditional forms of reading and writing, won't she teach this very same way (and value it as the supreme way?). Teacher Ed is one of those topics that isn't broached very often by professors operating within it. I guess its true that we all teach the way we THINK is best. None of us want to admit that there could possibly be a newer, fresher, more successful way.

marisa:

Good point. It's important to look at the pool of trainees -- the teachers of the future -- but it's just as important, if not more so, to look at how they are being trained, and by whom. Danielle is right, if the "old school" training models are still in place, then the newly educated are really just a younger version of old ideas. We see this pattern in all levels of education -- it's a self-perpetuating cycle. Teachers teach they way they were taught (by teachers who also taught they way they were taught, and so on.) Many teachers stick to a comfortable lesson plan (that might be somewhat out of touch with the students' needs/interests) and consequently the students are slowly alienated from the "love of learning" we talk about so often. A lot of "new" teachers seem to continue these patterns because they are being trained to teach in the same old ways, instead of incorporating new concepts and technologies (ie. social networking, globalization, etc.) that are so much a part of students' lives outside of school. As we enter Pink's "Conceptual Age" and begin to consider how to teach creativity and critical thinking skills (rather than information) to our students, how can we also develop these qualities in veteran teachers and teacher-educators who might be unaware or lacking?

Christy Forrest:

I also wonder how much of the creativity and innovative nature of a new teacher is squelched by the emphasis on pass rates on end of course tests? I have heard teachers say they would like to be more creative and do something different but are afraid to vary from the routine of teaching to the test. Eventually you just decide to do what you have to do to get through it- similar to the burnout Diane mentioned in her posting.

Post a comment

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on June 29, 2009 7:43 PM.

The previous post in this blog was “Fragments of my Imagination” …..

The next post in this blog is One Big Series of Constructions and Deconstructions.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35