When I was thinking of a title for these two articles, I started to realize that the most effective and meaningful time of their school day happened after school. If only we could have smaller more intense classes during the day to reach all these teenagers who are unmotivated and not interested in participating in their classes with texts. I suppose these groups had more leniency afterschool and the open environments that allowed topics of interest and discussion were not as regulated as they would probably be if conducted during a normal school day. I thought it was fascinating to see how these African American males in the Staples article took media and were re-authoring them. The skills they were using weren't pressed upon them, they just unintentionally were exercising them and developing them by re-authoring their pieces of work. The set up of the program was very inspiring because the teacher took away her authority and gave it to the students. The topics were related to these students' lives and more meaningful to them than texts from within a normal classroom. The time invested in this program by these students showed their dedication, freedom, value, commmunity and acceptance into this new avenue of literacy that they were developing and sharing openly with others. These students put themselves out there, and took risks. The framework for this was eye opening. What an awesome program to be apart of.
The same awe was reaffirmed when reading the Henry article. Both of these groups allowed for open discussions and a safe secure place for all members to participate. I noticed that each of the groups the students had the choice of writing in their journals or discussing the topics at hand. I was amazed to see how many chose to write. Relating that to my classroom today, it was like "pulling teeth" this year to get my kids to write. I even tried using fun writer's notebooks, and shared the Amelia's Notebook series with them to show them all the different ways a notebook could be used. I let them go with the concept of drawings in their notebooks, but then it was more drawings and less writing. But when I thought back to my teenage years, I could relate to the use of my diary. I started writing in my diary in 8th grade all the way up to my senior year in high school. It was amazing to reread as an adult.
The other part of the Henry article I found to be the most interesting was the feelings and emotions expressed through the term voice. These girls were afraid to express themselves and all their emotions were building up. I couldn't even begin to imagine how hard that would be to not be able to talk to my own mother about things because of our cultural status and expectations. But taking some time to relate to this, I didn't have that voice as a teenager either, but my restrictions were not a race issue per say. My issues were nothing compared to the limitations and expectations these girls had to live up to. The most lasting part of this article was what the research showed: "Black girls are expected to adopt female roles of passivity and complacency; they are invisible to teachers as serious learners; they receive less encouragement and rewards; they are assessed for their social skills rather than academic achievement; they are evaluated by their physical characteristics......" and it continues. Are schools helping this change? Is this something that Black girls will have to deal with the rest of their lives? As a teacher, my lasting thought was, how can I help change this?
Abby Boughton
Comments (4)
Abby,
I too was very impressed by both of these projects and the impact they made on the students' lives- academically and personally. I wished that there were more programs like this for high school students. The Staples article reference took place in Philadelphia and I am not sure about the other one, but I can see the meaningful relevance in any town, rural or urban. Often I think that there are too many things competing for attention in the lives of teenagers today. These programs provided a safe place for them to be open and honest with themselves and discover inner beliefs that most teens don't think about on their own. I was trying to think of things that our small town may offer high school students but none come to mind except after school sports, which can be demanding on them academically, or clubs like the debate team. I feel like interventions like these in the articles produced life altering results. To me this is a way to end the cycle of indifference some high schoolers have towards learning and education. I wish I knew a way to get more involvement from the community to implement more avenues like this.
Amy Reep
Posted by Amy Reep | June 13, 2010 8:05 PM
Posted on June 13, 2010 20:05
Abby I agreed with what you were saying when you were talking about the after school programs. I loved how they didn't push the learning on the students in "regular" way. Instead they took such a different route. I can only imagine how much the boys learned from working with the screen play. I realize that the afterschool program had much more flexibility than we do in a school setting. I do think though that we could all take ideas from this article and apply it to our classroom in a different way, with more structure and guidelines.
Posted by Katie Templeton | June 14, 2010 5:47 PM
Posted on June 14, 2010 17:47
Abby, Our school will be piloting a new program next year which seems similar. But I don't have all the details yet. We are eliminating advisor/advisee in our middle school. Yikes! This goes against the middle school concept, but we want to use our time better. The initial plans are to have the students play a larger role in what they learn during this 45 minute block of time. They will rotate throughout different classrooms in the building. Each teacher is to build lessons, of any sort, around the interests of the child. I can't remember the name of the new program though. But it seems similar to the ideas presented in the article.
Posted by Karen Chester | June 14, 2010 7:30 PM
Posted on June 14, 2010 19:30
Abby,
It wasn’t until I was reading your post that I realized that both studies took place after school. That is so powerful. Students were willing to participate in academic groups after school rather than spending their time hanging out, playing sports, or working. The students must have been yearning for a place to learn and be heard.
I agree with you that small groups seem to be such an effective way to really build relationships with students. Students ask more questions and volunteer more ideas in a small group. Small groups would be beneficial to those students who are ‘voiceless.’
Laura Corbello
Posted by Laura Corbello | June 15, 2010 4:32 PM
Posted on June 15, 2010 16:32