Reading chapter 5 of Reading Lives gave me a new perspective of the needs of many male students in the primary grades learning how to conform to a school discourse that does not involve the movement and choice awarded in the kindergarten classrooms. Learning about Jake’s difficult transition from a student-centered classroom into a more structured first grade curriculum where his home discourse is not recognized, illustrated how important a child’s view of school becomes when he feels disconnected from what he knows and loves best. Jake’s inability to move from his familiar language practices of home to the more unfamiliar textual practices of his first grade classroom caused him to view school as “dumb” because it did not meet his needs of video games, NASCAR racing, or his family business, in which he has already been designated as the future owner. Having never taught kindergarten, I did not realize how differently structured the classrooms are in first and second grade. I have taught second and third grade, where students have made the transition from a mobile, center-structured environment to a more traditional classroom of literacy practices that require more seat work that focus on skills and technique. His inability to “act out” his stories in first grade seemed to hinder his interest in storytelling in his writing workshop activities. If the teacher had been able to use Reader’s Theatre in the language arts block, perhaps he would have fulfilled his need for action in his classroom literacy practices. Jake and most boys in today’s culture, have a need for constant stimulation due to video games and the fast pace of most family households. The shift between their working-class home discourse and middle-class school discourse is often too difficult for our students to make and they become turned off by the demands of the classroom that do not meet their immediate needs.
How can we as teachers bridge this gap between boys who need stimulation in the classroom and the necessities of meeting the objectives of our curriculum while shaping competent students who can take standardized tests that evaluate their literacy success? When we have the ability to integrate the interests and needs of our students, we can create the hybrid student that shifts between discourses instead of separating them and ultimately choosing the one that solidifies his identity – home. The challenge is not to integrate one kind of home discourse but several in a classroom of twenty plus students. As I noted in a previous posting, I have basically three different cultures in my classroom and each have different literacy experiences in their home discourse. Fortunately, the interests of genders can usually be generalized among these different cultures and brought into the classroom to connect with many students at once. This year we talked about teen idols such as Justin Bieber and Hannah Montana that girls from all ethnicities admired, while the various boys displayed interest in soccer and video games. During independent reading and writer’s workshop, students were able to integrate their interests into the classroom where it was discussed and valued as part of their identity. (Although I must say, I was getting pretty tired of hearing about Justin Bieber and seeing his face on all the girls’ folders!)
Whether it is our male students or the females, understanding and recognizing their histories and identities in their classroom, can be crucial to building the critical literacy practices in the classroom that prepare for their success in a middle-class world.
Michelle Carlson
Comments (3)
Michelle,
I liked the comment you made about not including one other discourse in your classroom, but several. I had heard people say that all Hispanic females (for example) like this or that, but they are so wrong. We may find a few will similar interests, but we have to remember that they are all different and unique. Each child in our classroom is from a different walk of life, and we must teach to their needs.
Posted by Lisa Beach | June 28, 2011 8:00 PM
Posted on June 28, 2011 20:00
Michelle,
I enjoyed reading your perspectives on the importance of discourses within cultures and gender. We differentiate our curriculum academically. We do not teach all students in the same way. We need to apply this to our students' histories. Whilst as you say, gender can often be grouped according to 'Justin Bieber fans', home discourses are very much of the individual and we need to recognize this and differentiate and value them.
Posted by Karen Massey-Cerda | June 29, 2011 1:25 PM
Posted on June 29, 2011 13:25
Michelle, I really appreciated your comment, "The challenge is not to integrate one kind of home discourse but several in a classroom of twenty plus students." You are so right. It is easy enough to gain in-depth knowledge about one or two students and integrate their interests and discourses into the curriculum, as we've read in many of the articles. Few of us are working with only one or two students though! I think you're doing a great job with including readers's and writers' workshop in your classroom, because these methods allow for students to make their own choices about bringing in their interests and home cultures. Since we do have so many students, we need to encourage individual choice whenever possible so they know that what they value is also valued by their teachers.
Posted by Andrea Schlobohm | June 30, 2011 3:30 PM
Posted on June 30, 2011 15:30