This chapter was a good way to tie up what we've learned in this book. I've enjoyed reading about specific people and feel like it has been a great way to learn more about literacy. This text has been able to illustrate, through intimate looks through students' lives, how their early experiences influence their later literacy lives. I found particularly interesting the section about Mike Rose and the controversy he writes about in getting too involved in students' lives. As Hicks states, "he expresses how movement through particulars was necessary for his own understanding of the dilemmas faced by poor and working-class students--and presumably also for his readers' deeper understanding of those dilemmas..." (pg. 140). One of the points brought up was that learning about these students' lives in such an intimate sense could be a negative thing, that stereotypes could be formed and being too "seduced" into the narrative to see the educational point. However, I can't see why one would NOT want to learn about the particulars of a students' life. Isn't that where all the answers lie? Why does a student act a certain way? Well, let's look at how his or her home life is. Why can this child not read? Well, let's look at the particulars of how he or she was taught and what kind of support they are receiving at home. Of course, there are boundaries to be met, as Hicks mentions. We cannot get to fully into a child's home life as teachers. I'm sure even Hicks had road blocks when she was trying to research these children at home. But we can take little steps, like asking our students about their likes and dislikes and taking the time to get to know them at the beginning of the school year. If they are acting out, take them aside and ask them what's going on, rather than calling them out and potentially embarrassing them in front of the entire class.
While we are all part of a very institutionalized setting everyday at our schools, we need to realize that the reason we're there is for the lives of the students we encounter everyday. To attempt to become part of those lives would make a lot of difference. I'm grateful for people like Hicks who take that time to do such quality research that really does make a difference for people like us reading it.
Christy Rivers
Comments (3)
Christy,
It's interesting to hear your ideas of Mike Rose's points in the chapter because I did not get the same idea, which makes me want to go back and reread that section. From the text, I thought his message was for teachers to not let the "institution of schooling" boggle you down so much that you don't have the opportunity to focus on students lives. But, I may be wrong and confusing one of the other researchers messages in the chapter with Rose's message.
Posted by Elizabeth Griffin | April 27, 2009 3:11 PM
Posted on April 27, 2009 15:11
Christy,
I appreciate your pointing out Rose's warning about stereotypes. This caught my eye in the reading this week also. Because of my own upbringing, I know that I am very prone to stereotyping people in general. I try to guard against this, but do wonder if getting to know students' home backgrounds may simply confirm some traditional stereotypes in my mind. Last week's reading about Jake was a personal wake-up call for me in this area. Although I would like to think I consider each child individually, I realize how much I am a product of a particular discourse. Because I am more aware of my own thinking, I think I am in a better place to guard against this behavior. I know that I will have to continue to work to reshape my thinking. But it is worth it. It makes sense for me to work to be exactly what I should be so that I can help my students be who they ARE.
Posted by Lisa Rasey | April 27, 2009 7:19 PM
Posted on April 27, 2009 19:19
Christy, I agree that we should learn as much about a student's life as possible. For me, this helps to explain a lot about a student's personality and any changes a teacher might see. Things like divorce, abuse, a new baby, or illness in the family are very important things that can severely impact a child, especially when dealing with elementary children. This is why I always ask parents to let me know what is going on. Not so that I can pry, but so that I can better help their student cope and adapt to change. Some may think this is a negative, but so far it has been nothing about a positive.
Posted by Whitney Gilbert | April 27, 2009 9:47 PM
Posted on April 27, 2009 21:47