Students from cultures other than the dominant one have too often been marginalized in educational settings. They have not been given enough opportunities for exploration, thought, discussion, or chances to write about issues crucial to their own lives. They have been systematically conditioned throughout their time in school to submit to the expectations of the dominant members of culture, society, or gender stereotypes. This absence of opportunity, especially prevalent for young Black women, leaves students voiceless. “Voice is power – power to express ideas, connections, power to direct and shape an individual life towards a productive and positive fulfillment for self …” This lack of personal voice then, leaves students powerless. These students may experience alienation and cultural isolation, as well as other barriers to assimilation. Henry has attempted to de-program societal rules from these passively silenced students by providing safe opportunities to express themselves verbally and in writing. Students were asked to interact as a group, allowing them to develop confidence in their own expressive abilities. The girls were motivated to actively participate in articulating their viewpoints, feelings and concerns on a variety of topics relevant to their lives.
Henry’s longitudinal study included 7 female African Caribbean students aged
13 – 14. They met weekly for 30 – 40 minutes each session to read and discuss cultural literature, films, and videos chosen to stimulate connections to the girls’ lives. The girls kept a response journal, giving them opportunity to write without regard to grammatical conventions. Henry discovered that time was needed to gain students’ trust, initiate critical discussions, and to come to the realization that it was okay to “speak up” about pressing topics, issues, and problems relating to personal experiences. Henry related that it took time for the group to understand there was possibly more than one right answer to a question. As the sessions progressed, the girls conferenced with each other, looked at strengths in each others’ writing, and offered suggestions for improvement.
The introduction of culturally relevant materials must have been particularly empowering and motivating for this group of African Caribbean students. Instead of being dismissed as “other”, outside the circle of literate focus, Henry was able to bring these students to a safe place, a carefully crafted forum of trust where they could break down boundaries and discuss topics otherwise off limits and out of place in the usual classroom curriculum. By doing so, the researcher could successfully address academic issues with motivated, engaged and connected learners who, in their own words, “had never been more excited…about school.”
We cannot expect these otherwise excluded students to actively participate in a classroom that does not have any connection to their lives. Nor can they engage with teachers who refuse to recognize who their students are, or what cultural, societal, and personal backgrounds they bring with them. If we truly value diversity in the classroom, we as educators must move past the status quo in the learning environment. We must make it our prime objective to creatively expand upon the requirements of the curriculum. With careful, thoughtful selection of materials and subject matter tailored to the needs of our students, we can offer each individual student a chance to bridge the gap from his / her own personal reality to a meaningful and honest connection to an otherwise foreign real world.
Annie Croon
Comments (5)
Annie, I'm glad you mentioned the fact that Henry allowed the girls to write with total disregard to grammatical convention. This is crucial in developing good writers. In my research class last semester, Dr. Koppenhaver did an exercise that I'll never forget called "handcuff writing." It illustrated--by our own participation in the exercise--how harmful it can be to restrict and remind our students constantly of the rules of writing. It actually makes them write LESS because they're not thinking about their ideas, they're thinking about the stinking rules! And you know in this case, that Henry got far more out of these girls than she would have had she made them observe grammar conventions.
Posted by erin farrington | June 15, 2009 2:04 AM
Posted on June 15, 2009 02:04
Annie,
You make a strong point stating: we, as educators, must move past the status quo in the learning environment. I agree; however, I have seen way too many seasoned teachers not want to make this change. Do you have suggestions to do this?
Posted by Loren Van De Griek | June 15, 2009 3:15 PM
Posted on June 15, 2009 15:15
Annie,
I'm glad you pulled the quote "voice is power." One of my goals in this course is for everyone to grow to appreciate how "literacy is power" -- literacy in all its forms, not just reading and writing. I have seen that once teachers really believe that literacy is power, and how literacy is connected to culture and identity, their classrooms change. Loren posed an important question -- I have no specific answers, but I do know that several students who took this same course in the past have put together reading packets of these articles and are reading them as faculty in their school, and forming reading groups!
Posted by Alecia Jackson | June 15, 2009 3:20 PM
Posted on June 15, 2009 15:20
Annie,
Literacy is power, and as you mentioned Henry allowed the girls to write without pointing out grammatical errors. In order to get students to write, you cannot set boundaries due to the fact students aren't going to open up because of the risk of making mistakes in their writing. Journaling or writer's notebooks are a great way to pose writing to students where they can write, list, draw or whatever without boundaries. I agree that we have to make connections, but not with just one race, but all. In addition, we as teachers need to make each race of students more aware of one anothers cultures so they can learn about and from one another, hopefully leading to an appreciation for one another's culture.
Posted by Heather Houston | June 16, 2009 12:53 PM
Posted on June 16, 2009 12:53
Annie,
With technology increasing and pencil and pad decreasing in the classroom, allowing freedom in the classroom to choose topics and making cultural materials available to all students will increase student motivation. I try to give multiple choices when giving writing prompts but found that student collaboration works best with all age children. Throwing in other background knowledge of different life styles should only enhance one's thinking and creativity. Researching student's culture differences on line by streamlining or pairing up students at computers also gives students the advantage of writing or typing on a computer or paper.
Posted by Robin Hand | June 25, 2009 6:48 PM
Posted on June 25, 2009 18:48